BRICS: Acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa

ByObeydul Haque Reading Time: 7 minutes

The term “BRIC” was coined in 2001 by Jim O’Neill, then chief economist at Goldman Sachs, in a report titled Building Better Global Economic BRICs. O’Neill identified Brazil, Russia, India, and China as economies with the potential to become dominant players in the 21st-century global economy due to their large populations, vast resources, and rapid growth rates. At the time, these countries were seen as the engines of future global growth, distinct from the established economic powers of the United States, Europe, and Japan.

The BRIC countries formalized their partnership in 2006, holding their first high-level meeting on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly. The inaugural BRIC summit took place in Yekaterinburg, Russia, in 2009, marking the group’s transition from a conceptual framework to a political and economic alliance. In 2010, South Africa was invited to join, expanding the acronym to BRICS and adding an African voice to the coalition. South Africa’s inclusion was strategic, reflecting the group’s ambition to represent diverse regions of the Global South, including Latin America, Eurasia, South Asia, East Asia, and Africa.

The formation of BRICS was driven by a shared desire to reform the global economic order, which the member states viewed as skewed in favor of Western powers. Institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and World Trade Organization (WTO) were seen as reflecting the priorities of the United States and its allies, often marginalizing the interests of developing nations. BRICS sought to amplify the voice of emerging economies, advocate for a multipolar world, and promote equitable global governance.

The Economic Significance of BRICS

BRICS countries collectively account for a significant share of the global economy. As of 2025, their combined GDP is estimated at over $30 trillion, surpassing the economic output of the European Union and rivaling that of the G7. Each member brings unique strengths to the table:

  • China: The world’s second-largest economy, China is a manufacturing powerhouse and a leader in technology and infrastructure development. Its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) aligns with BRICS’ focus on connectivity and development.
  • India: With one of the fastest-growing economies, India excels in information technology, pharmaceuticals, and services. Its young population and expanding middle class make it a key market for global investment.
  • Russia: A major energy exporter, Russia provides critical resources like oil, gas, and minerals. Its geopolitical influence and military capabilities add strategic depth to the group.
  • Brazil: A leader in agriculture and renewable energy, Brazil is a vital player in global food security and environmental sustainability.
  • South Africa: As Africa’s most industrialized economy, South Africa serves as a gateway to the continent, rich in minerals and strategic maritime routes.

Together, BRICS countries control vast reserves of natural resources, including oil, gas, rare earth minerals, and agricultural products. They also represent a massive consumer market, with a combined population of over 3.5 billion people. This economic clout has enabled BRICS to challenge the dominance of the US dollar in global trade and advocate for alternative financial systems.

One of the group’s most significant achievements is the establishment of the New Development Bank (NDB), headquartered in Shanghai, China. Launched in 2015, the NDB provides funding for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in BRICS countries and other developing nations. Unlike the IMF or World Bank, the NDB operates without stringent conditionalities, emphasizing sovereignty and mutual benefit. By 2025, the NDB has approved over $35 billion in loans for projects ranging from renewable energy in India to transportation networks in Brazil.

Another key initiative is the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA), a $100 billion pool of foreign exchange reserves designed to provide liquidity to member states during financial crises. The CRA serves as a safety net, reducing reliance on Western-dominated institutions like the IMF. While the CRA has not been extensively utilized, its existence underscores BRICS’ commitment to financial autonomy.

Geopolitical Influence and Multipolarity

Beyond economics, BRICS has emerged as a geopolitical force advocating for a multipolar world order. The group’s members share a skepticism of Western unilateralism, particularly the United States’ use of sanctions, military interventions, and control over global financial systems. BRICS summits often feature calls for reforming the United Nations Security Council, increasing representation for developing nations, and promoting a rules-based international order free from hegemonic influence.

Russia and China, in particular, have used BRICS as a platform to counter Western dominance. For Russia, BRICS offers a way to mitigate the impact of Western sanctions imposed following its annexation of Crimea in 2014 and subsequent geopolitical tensions. China, meanwhile, sees BRICS as a complement to its broader foreign policy goals, including the BRI and the expansion of its influence in Africa and Latin America.

India and Brazil bring a more nuanced perspective, balancing their BRICS commitments with partnerships in the West. India, for instance, is a member of the Quad (alongside the US, Japan, and Australia), which aims to counterbalance China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific. Brazil, under different administrations, has oscillated between aligning with BRICS and pursuing closer ties with the United States. South Africa, as the smallest economy, focuses on leveraging BRICS to amplify Africa’s voice and attract investment to the continent.

BRICS’ geopolitical influence was further solidified by its expansion in 2024, when Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates were invited to join as full members. This move broadened the group’s geographic and ideological scope, incorporating key players from the Middle East and Africa. The expanded BRICS now represents nearly half of the world’s population and a significant share of global oil production, strengthening its leverage in energy markets.

Achievements of BRICS

Over the past two decades, BRICS has achieved notable successes:

  1. Institutional Development: The NDB and CRA are landmark institutions that demonstrate BRICS’ ability to create alternatives to Western-led financial systems. The NDB’s focus on sustainable development aligns with global priorities like the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
  2. Trade and Investment: Intra-BRICS trade has grown significantly, reaching over $500 billion annually by 2025. China and India, in particular, have deepened economic ties, despite occasional border tensions.
  3. Technology Cooperation: BRICS has fostered collaboration in areas like artificial intelligence, 5G, and renewable energy. The BRICS Science, Technology, and Innovation Framework promotes joint research and development.
  4. Cultural Exchange: Initiatives like the BRICS Film Festival, Youth Summit, and Academic Forum have strengthened people-to-people ties, fostering mutual understanding among diverse cultures.
  5. Global Advocacy: BRICS has been a vocal advocate for climate justice, arguing that developed nations bear greater responsibility for historical emissions. The group has also pushed for fair access to vaccines and medical resources, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.

These achievements have elevated BRICS’ stature as a credible platform for cooperation, distinct from traditional alliances like NATO or the G7.

Challenges Facing BRICS

Despite its successes, BRICS faces significant challenges that threaten its cohesion and effectiveness:

  1. Internal Disparities: The economic disparity between members is stark. China’s GDP is larger than that of the other four combined, creating an imbalance in influence. Smaller economies like South Africa struggle to assert themselves within the group.
  2. Geopolitical Rivalries: Tensions between China and India, particularly over border disputes, have occasionally strained BRICS’ unity. Similarly, Russia’s focus on security contrasts with Brazil and South Africa’s emphasis on development.
  3. Dependence on the Dollar: Despite calls for de-dollarization, BRICS countries remain heavily reliant on the US dollar for trade and reserves. Efforts to promote local currency trade have progressed slowly.
  4. Western Pushback: The United States and its allies view BRICS with suspicion, particularly as a China-led initiative. Western sanctions on Russia and scrutiny of Chinese investments complicate BRICS’ global integration.
  5. Expansion Dilemmas: The inclusion of new members in 2024 has raised questions about coherence. Integrating countries with diverse political systems and economic priorities could dilute BRICS’ focus.

These challenges highlight the difficulty of uniting diverse nations under a common agenda, particularly in a polarized global environment.

The Future of BRICS

Looking ahead, BRICS is poised to play a pivotal role in shaping the global order. Several trends will define its trajectory:

  1. De-dollarization Efforts: BRICS is exploring alternatives to the US dollar, including digital currencies and barter systems. The group’s central banks are studying blockchain-based payment systems to reduce reliance on SWIFT, the Western-controlled financial messaging network.
  2. Climate Leadership: As climate change becomes a pressing issue, BRICS countries are investing heavily in renewable energy and green technology. The NDB’s focus on sustainable projects positions BRICS as a leader in climate finance for the Global South.
  3. Regional Influence: Expanded BRICS membership enhances its influence in the Middle East and Africa, key regions for energy and trade. Saudi Arabia and Iran’s inclusion could shift global oil dynamics, while Ethiopia and Egypt strengthen Africa’s representation.
  4. Digital Economy: BRICS is well-positioned to lead in the digital economy, with China and India at the forefront of AI, fintech, and e-commerce. Collaborative frameworks could set global standards in emerging technologies.
  5. Global Governance Reform: BRICS will continue advocating for changes to the UN, IMF, and WTO, seeking greater representation for developing nations. Its expanded membership gives it more leverage in these discussions.

However, BRICS must navigate internal divisions and external pressures to realize its potential. Strengthening institutional mechanisms, like the NDB and CRA, and fostering trust among members will be critical. The group’s ability to balance cooperation with competition—particularly between China and India—will determine its long-term success.

Conclusion

BRICS represents a bold experiment in global cooperation, uniting five diverse nations to challenge the status quo and champion the interests of the Global South. From its origins as an economic concept to its current role as a geopolitical force, BRICS has made remarkable strides in fostering development, trade, and dialogue. Institutions like the New Development Bank and initiatives like intra-BRICS trade demonstrate the group’s tangible impact.

Yet, BRICS is not without flaws. Economic disparities, geopolitical rivalries, and external pressures test its unity and resolve. As it expands and evolves, BRICS must address these challenges to remain a credible alternative to Western-led institutions.

I (plan to) write about business, finance, SEO, WordPress, and whatever else interests me. You might find those interesting too. For now, find me on Twitter/ X.