Zencastr vs. Riverside FM

ByObeydul Haque

The podcasting landscape has evolved dramatically over the past decade, with remote recording tools becoming essential for creators worldwide. Two platforms that consistently rise to the top of the conversation are Zencastr and Riverside FM. Both are powerful, web-based solutions designed to simplify high-quality audio and video recording, but they cater to slightly different needs and workflows. In 2025, podcasters face a pivotal choice: which tool offers the best combination of features, reliability, and value for their specific goals? In this review, we’ll dive deep into Zencastr and Riverside FM, comparing their features, usability, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which platform deserves a spot in your podcasting toolkit.

Zencastr vs. Riverside FM

Zencastr: The Audio-First Veteran

Zencastr, launched in November 2016 by engineer Josh Nielsen, has long been a favorite among podcasters who prioritize audio quality and simplicity. Initially designed as an audio-only recording platform, it has since expanded to include video capabilities, positioning itself as an all-in-one solution for remote podcasting. Zencastr’s hallmark is its reliability and ease of use, making it a go-to for creators who want separate audio tracks and minimal fuss. With high-profile users like John Lee Dumas of Entrepreneur on Fire and Victor Marks of the Apple Insider Podcast, Zencastr has built a reputation for consistency.

Riverside FM: The Video-and-Audio Powerhouse

Riverside FM, founded in 2020 by brothers Gideon and Nadav Keyson, entered the scene with a bold mission: to bring studio-quality audio and video recording to remote creators. Unlike Zencastr’s audio-first roots, Riverside was built from the ground up to handle both mediums seamlessly. It’s gained traction among podcasters, YouTubers, and even major brands like Marvel and Spotify, thanks to its 4K video recording, local track capture, and robust post-production tools. Riverside positions itself as a versatile platform for creators who want to diversify their content across audio podcasts, video episodes, and live streams.

Both platforms share a core philosophy: delivering professional-grade recordings without the need for a physical studio. But their approaches—and the tools they offer—diverge in ways that could sway your decision. Let’s break it down.

Feature Comparison

Audio Quality

  • Zencastr: Zencastr records audio in lossless 16-bit 44.1kHz WAV format (on paid plans), ensuring crisp, high-fidelity sound. Each participant’s audio is captured on a separate track locally, meaning internet hiccups won’t degrade quality. Its automatic post-production mixing enhances tracks further, reducing the need for manual editing.
  • Riverside FM: Riverside ups the ante with uncompressed 48kHz WAV audio, a slight edge over Zencastr’s 44.1kHz. Like Zencastr, it records separate tracks locally on each participant’s device, safeguarding quality regardless of connection stability. Its “Magic Audio” feature uses AI to clean up sound, tackling background noise and leveling volumes automatically.

Verdict: Riverside edges out slightly with its higher sample rate and AI-powered audio cleanup, but Zencastr’s audio quality is still excellent for most podcasters. If audio is your sole focus, either will serve you well.

Video Quality

  • Zencastr: Video recording is a newer addition to Zencastr, available up to 1080p HD on paid plans (720p on lower tiers). It’s functional for basic video podcasts but lacks the polish of a dedicated video platform. Sync issues between audio and video have been reported occasionally, requiring manual fixes in post-production.
  • Riverside FM: Riverside shines here, offering up to 4K video resolution (on higher-tier plans). Its local recording ensures pristine video quality, even with shaky internet. Features like screen sharing and live streaming to platforms like YouTube or Twitch make it a powerhouse for video-first creators.

Verdict: Riverside is the clear winner for video. Zencastr’s video capabilities feel like an add-on, while Riverside’s are a core strength.

Recording and Editing Tools

  • Zencastr: Zencastr keeps it simple with a user-friendly recording interface and a live soundboard for adding pre-recorded audio clips (up to 10 tracks). Its automatic post-production suite mixes and enhances audio, though advanced editing requires external software. Processing times can delay access to final files.
  • Riverside FM: Riverside offers a more robust toolkit. Its “Media Board” supports both audio and video clips, and the AI-powered “Magic Editor” generates shareable clips from your recordings. Automatic transcriptions (in over 100 languages) and captions streamline repurposing content. However, comprehensive editing still requires exporting to tools like Adobe Audition or Premiere.

Verdict: Riverside’s editing features are more advanced and integrated, especially for video and social media content. Zencastr’s tools are solid but leaner, best for audio-focused workflows.

Guest Experience

  • Zencastr: Guests join via a simple link, no software installation required. It works on Chrome, Edge, and Brave, offering decent browser flexibility. The interface is intuitive, though there’s no “green room” for pre-recording prep.
  • Riverside FM: Riverside also uses a link-based system and supports Chrome, with mobile apps for iOS and Android adding convenience. Its producer mode lets admins monitor and control sessions, and guests can join from their phones in HD—a big plus for accessibility.

Verdict: Riverside takes the lead with mobile support and producer controls, though Zencastr’s simplicity is still guest-friendly.

Live Streaming

  • Zencastr: No native live streaming. You’d need to pair it with a separate tool like StreamYard for real-time broadcasts.
  • Riverside FM: Built-in live streaming to multiple platforms (e.g., YouTube, Facebook) with up to 4K video, making it ideal for engaging live audiences.

Verdict: Riverside wins hands-down for live streaming.

Integrations and Hosting

  • Zencastr: Offers podcast hosting alongside recording, with seamless redirects from platforms like Anchor. Integrations include Google Drive for storage, and its all-in-one approach eliminates extra subscriptions for some users.
  • Riverside FM: No built-in hosting, but it integrates with Spotify for Podcasters and other distribution platforms. Cloud backups ensure file safety, and its focus remains on recording and editing rather than hosting.

Verdict: Zencastr’s hosting feature is a bonus for streamlining workflows, while Riverside prioritizes production quality over distribution.

Pricing

Zencastr

  • Free Plan: Limited to 2 guests and 8 hours/month of recording, with 720p video.
  • Professional Plan: $20/month (billed annually) for unlimited guests, 16-bit 44.1kHz WAV audio, 1080p video, and hosting.
  • Growth Plan: $45/month for additional analytics and monetization tools.
  • 14-day free trial on premium plans.

Riverside FM

  • Free Plan: 60 minutes of recording, 720p video, separate tracks.
  • Standard Plan: $19/month (billed annually) for 5 hours/month, 1080p video, and core features.
  • Pro Plan: $29/month for 15 hours/month, 4K video, live streaming, and advanced tools.
  • Business Plan: Custom pricing for teams.
  • No credit card required for the free trial.

Verdict: Zencastr’s pricing is straightforward and budget-friendly, especially with hosting included. Riverside offers more features per tier but caps recording hours, which could add up for prolific creators. Your choice depends on whether you value simplicity (Zencastr) or premium features (Riverside).

Usability and Reliability

Zencastr

  • Usability: Zencastr’s interface is clean and intuitive, with a “dark mode” recording room that’s easy on the eyes. Setup is quick—name your episode, tweak settings, and invite guests. It’s best for audio purists who don’t need bells and whistles.
  • Reliability: Users praise its stability, though past outages and occasional sync issues have been noted. It’s rock-solid for audio but less consistent with video.

Riverside FM

  • Usability: Riverside’s dashboard is sleek and feature-rich, balancing power with accessibility. Mobile apps and producer mode enhance flexibility, though its Chrome-only restriction (on desktop) may frustrate some users.
  • Reliability: Local recording and cloud backups make Riverside highly dependable, even with poor internet. Some users report slow customer support or technical glitches, but overall, it’s robust.

Verdict: Zencastr is simpler to use, while Riverside offers more control and flexibility. Reliability is strong for both, with Riverside’s video edge giving it a slight advantage.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Zencastr

  • Strengths: Affordable, reliable audio, built-in hosting, user-friendly for beginners.
  • Weaknesses: Limited video quality (1080p max), no live streaming, basic editing tools, occasional sync issues.

Riverside FM

  • Strengths: Superior video (4K), advanced AI editing, live streaming, mobile app support.
  • Weaknesses: Higher cost for heavy users, no hosting, Chrome-only on desktop, large file sizes.

Who Should Choose Zencastr?

Zencastr is ideal for:

  • Audio-only podcasters on a budget.
  • Beginners seeking simplicity and hosting in one package.
  • Creators who don’t need advanced video or live streaming.

Who Should Choose Riverside FM?

Riverside suits:

  • Video podcasters or hybrid creators aiming for top-tier quality.
  • Professionals needing AI tools, live streaming, or mobile flexibility.
  • Teams with producers managing complex sessions.

Final Thoughts

In 2025, the Zencastr vs. Riverside FM debate hinges on your priorities. If you’re an audio-focused podcaster who values affordability and an all-in-one solution, Zencastr remains a stellar choice. Its $20/month Professional plan delivers unlimited recording and hosting, making it a cost-effective workhorse.

For creators eyeing video podcasts, live streams, or advanced editing, Riverside FM is the superior option. Its 4K video, AI-powered tools, and mobile support justify the $19–$29/month price tag for those who can leverage its full potential. The hourly limits may sting for high-volume users, but the quality and versatility are unmatched.

Ultimately, test both with their free tiers. Zencastr’s simplicity might win you over for quick audio wins, while Riverside’s polish could elevate your multimedia game. In a rapidly evolving podcasting world, your choice today shapes your content tomorrow—choose wisely!

I (plan to) write about business, finance, SEO, WordPress, and whatever else interests me. You might find those interesting too. For now, find me on Twitter/ X.